{"id":274,"date":"2016-04-14T11:11:10","date_gmt":"2016-04-14T15:11:10","guid":{"rendered":"\/?p=274"},"modified":"2016-04-14T11:11:10","modified_gmt":"2016-04-14T15:11:10","slug":"fcc-announces-total-call-mobile-51-million-nal-for-lifeline-overbilling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tlp.law\/2016\/04\/14\/fcc-announces-total-call-mobile-51-million-nal-for-lifeline-overbilling\/","title":{"rendered":"FCC Announces Total Call Mobile $51 Million NAL for Lifeline Overbilling"},"content":{"rendered":"

Last week, the Commission released a Notice of Apparent Liability for Forfeiture and Order<\/a> finding Total Call Mobile (\u201cTCM\u201d) apparently liable for overbilling the Lifeline program by enrolling tens of thousands of duplicate and ineligible consumers into the program. \u00a0The Commission proposes a $51,070,322 forfeiture penalty, which reflects the seriousness, duration, and scope of TCM\u2019s multiple apparent violations. \u00a0The categories of TCM\u2019s apparent violations involve:<\/p>\n